Nova1789

Nova1789 wrote:
AidenTheRandomDude wrote:
Nova1789 wrote:
TheUltimateHoodie wrote:
Nova1789 wrote:
AidenTheRandomDude wrote:
Nova1789 wrote:
AidenTheRandomDude wrote:
Nova1789 wrote:
DangerPuppy10 wrote:
Nova1789 wrote:
There is one con (idk if this was said yet because i just found this lol)
Private Messaging.
No, because the collaboration would be public to the owner's profile.
Ah, but the user may be underrated, or may try to mask the project. (Not to mention there could be inappropriate roleplay)
However, we could easily fix this by putting the collab under review each turn (this may be hard)
Disagree, a moderator should watch over a collab.
Not a very ideal solution, scratch is a non-profit organisiation, so making it so that staff would watch over the collab would be difficult since one staff would likley have to watch a hundred collabs at once.
why not just hire more staff?
I see what you mean, but more staff means more money, since you would expect to be paid in a job, so scratch may start charging you for simpler things. (Like being capped to uploading a few projects a day and paying to upload more, free trails, etc.)
Here's how the under review feature may or may not work:
User 1 takes their turn:: #8c33b8
User 1 inserts personal information or private message :: #8c33b8
User lets User 2 take their turn:: #8c33b8
Current state of project is put in review list for moderator to review:: #8c33b8
Moderator looks at project :: #8c33b8
Take Down Project:: #8c33b8
Potentially ban users depending on message:: #8c33b8
end [collab v] :: control
This scenario also has it's own issues due to the number of staff, so it may be difficult to moderate.
Reports already take 12 hours (give or take some extra time), with very limited projects moderators have to look through. With that system, moderators would have to look though hundreds, maybe even thousands, of projects daily. The waiting time could be pushed from 12 hours to months.
Then this means this is impossible to prevent private messaging, so this idea should be rejected.
Comments.
That isn’t simple, someone could see it before the comment gets deleted, it has to be shown on the owner’s profile the current collab and allow people to look inside (not able to edit any code though.) making private collabs that they don’t want people to see physically impossible.

Wait… what if we make it so that you can type only a restricted amount of words? That may prevent it…