the_awsome_penguinja

Blue_Moon2607 wrote:
the_awsome_penguinja wrote:
Blue_Moon2607 wrote:
-85 pts | Spamming or misuse of any Scratch features
rip tag spammers

anyway no support, I think it's a little harsh to block a user based on what gets taken down, especially when some users don't know something is against the CG/TOU
example: extension policy
I know, spammers are bad anyway.

The reason they take it down is because of safety concerns, malicious behaviour and it violates TOU. The mistake is skipping the part of the Community Guidelines or the TOU, that's why they don't realise what is not right.

read the second part of my posts , I already knew about the no tag spamming rule