TheUltimateHoodie wrote:
starlightsparker wrote:
TheUltimateHoodie wrote:
starlightsparker wrote:
who said people who break this rule get blocked
people who mention browser extensions for the first time probs only get warned.
I know who I'm talking about, even though I can't mention them.
they can appeal. not knowing its not allowed is a genuine reason to be unblocked, and they would probably be unblocked if they appealed.
The main thing I'm concerned about is if Scratch Team won't accept their appeal! This makes the entire system unfair. Also, I'm pretty sure not knowing its not allowed isn't a genuine reason to be unblocked; that's like killing somebody and later saying to the police, “I'm sorry, I didn't know it wasn't allowed”. No matter what the murderer thinks, the person will still be dead. If it was a genuine reason, that would be a whole issue all by it's own.

look, if actually breaking cg and apologizing can get someone unblocked, not knowing certainly can. also, you cant compare a murder to this. anyways, naming browser extensions is a pretty mild offense, so not knowing it exists and clarifying that in their appeal can probably get one unblocked.