jvvg

If the Scratch Team truly required proof beyond a reasonable doubt before taking any admin actions, they would basically not be able to take down anything in any reasonable amount of time. It's a tough balance between not unfairly taking things down and keeping the site safe, and ultimately the consequences of not taking down bad content are a lot worse than the consequences for accidentally taking something down that didn't need to be taken down. Also, there is a way to appeal these things. But in reality, false positives are a lot less common than users think due to the fact that users have a tendency to lie about why they were banned to get sympathy and people are a lot less likely to complain about getting banned fairly vs. unfairly, so fair bans are a lot less visible.