Contraery Contraery loading

IAmTr_41 wrote:

(#6)
Look, as a BIA Modder, it does not contain any type of violence.
…Atleast you could tone down your thumbnails in that case.

IAmTr_41 wrote:

(#6)
ST is just trying to purge entire Scratch History Community because of a (…)
… When did I say that's the only reason?

IAmTr_41 wrote:

(#6)
We even wrote disclaimers, and the ST did not care.

CG wrote:

We welcome people of all ages, (…)
In that strict regard, everything on Scratch has to be that way. Things that are merely on the border, however aren't that bad, end up on NFE.

And I'm already citing a source. Keep in mind it's from a former ST Member, but that announcement is always in affect.

FNaF Announcement

I'm only focusing on the ones that matter here, others unrelated.

Why not implement an age appropriateness rating system on Scratch?
Everything shared in our community should be appropriate for all ages. Any type of age restriction by the Scratch Team, community members, or creators isn’t aligned with this philosophy.

Can I put a disclaimer on my Scratch project to warn people it's not for all ages?
Everything shared in our community should be appropriate for all ages. Any content that requires a disclaimer or warning isn't aligned with this philosophy and would not be suitable for Scratch. If a warning is needed, it is probably not appropriate for Scratch.

Why are you unsharing my project for being “too scary” when my 6 year-old nephew / sibling / cousin loves it and doesn't think it's scary?
Finding one example of a younger person that is not disturbed by FNAF or similar content doesn't prove that there aren't many others who do find it disturbing. We have heard feedback from many kids, parents, and teachers over the years who feel that some FNAF and similar content in projects are not appropriate for Scratch.
EDIT:

IAmTr_41 wrote:

(#12)
So what about Scratch Jr? It's for kids too.
That's for younger ones.
EDIT2:

24cjackson wrote:

(#13)
The pictures are starting to be highly censored
…Sorry to bring in PFPs here, but your PFP makes that hard to believe.